On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:01:31PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > A work that only allows distribution of patches does not meet DFSG #4. > It must also specifically allow the distribution of modified binaries > made from those patches.
Maybe it's just me, but since I can't read binary, I would find binary documentation pretty useless. > The GFDL fails to even do this, since you cannot distribute Opaque > version(s) of the work that exclude the invariant section(s). Apples and oranges. You can't compare an opaque version of a document to a compiled binary. It's the same document whether it's in ASCII .txt or MS Word .doc format. --Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
