On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 07:02:12PM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> So, firstly, congratulations on http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html -
> it has made the processing of new packages a lot more transparent.
> 
> Which has resulted in more and more packages being processed quicker,
> however it has also made apparent that you have difficulties when it
> comes to deciding on some packages.
> 
> One process modification I would suggest is that rather than leaving
> packages in 'NEW queue limbo' if you are not able to reject or accept them 
> after 2 months, you refer the package to the technical committee instead.

I dont think adding an other detour to Yet Another Team is adding
any value at all. people *do* look at the problematic packages in
NEW and work on the issues involved. why would the technical
committee be any better then those people? 

Those stalled packages pose serious non-technical problems. I
suggest to NOT form the "non-technical committee" but let the
ftp-master team try to solve the problem and trust them to call
for help if they need it ... or at least give them more time
untill you start restructuring.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to