-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04-05-2005 12:35, Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 12:09:49AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > >>On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:39:55AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote: >> >>>On Monday 25 April 2005 08.03, Branden Robinson / Debian Project Leader >>>wrote: >>> >>>>* establishing a backup site for ``snapshot.debian.net`` >> >>>I wonder if snapshot shouldn't be promoted to an official debian.*org* >>>service in recognition of its value to the project. >> >>One concern I have, personally, is over precisely how much value >>snapshot.d.n provides to the *project*, as opposed to providing value to >>others outside the project. Since DDs have access to recently removed >>packages via the morgue on merkel (albeit not indexed nicely the way >>snapshot.d.n currently is), I really wonder if this service should be a >>priority for Debian to spend money on while our ports and other areas of >>core infrastructure are in a state of disarray (IMHO). > > > I think that snapshot.d.n is vital for such case as someone wanting to grab > all the sources corresponding to the installed packages or something such.
Binaries (which takes up the huge amounts of space) are not needed for that, right? - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nÃr: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCeP4un7DbMsAkQLgRAvcEAKCBZ2Dfh/x8guWWzAb23JBzaz2quACdEwsJ s2+O2XacjDNn9chOZzyBOv4= =hUkx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
