-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 28-05-2005 07:04, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Fri, 27 May 2005 20:39:09 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > >>Your reaction sounded to me like you want Debian developers (and >>especially ones with trusted jobs within our organisation?) treated >>any different than other consultants. I disagree with that (and hope >>I misunderstood you). > > > Sounds more like apply common sense and utilize information > you may have obtained from any other source, apart from the proper > filing of the appropriate bureaucratic forms in triplicate. Or could > you really have been under the misapprehension that Joey has fallen > off the face of the earth, or is no longer with Debian?
Dear Manoj, I believe you cut out the part of my email were I explained what I mean. No, I don't see the current guidelines as related to "bureaucratic forms in triplicate". Rather, I see it as focusing on consultants interested in email communication. Participating in Debian - even doing highly trusted jobs - has shown to be possible even without such interest. I am not against relaxing the guidelines, but personally do not see the current ones as problematic. What I *do* see as problematic is if we treat Debian developers any different from outsiders on that list. Kind regards, - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCmDwGn7DbMsAkQLgRAvmAAJ40QtXsDKcpcnB8czbdpgaR76L8jQCcD79u q1HiYrHRVHqMMP+JnnC+8yw= =ciWT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
