Ean Schuessler wrote:
R. Armiento wrote:
The "bug" here is just about that the current setup may make it a little
too easy for people who will be offended by WebCollage to still accidently
install and use it. It is sensible to both 1) keep things available for people
who want to use them 2) help people avoid running things they do not
wish to run.
[...]
Users should make those choices for themselves.
Yes, thank you for this short and elegant restatement of what I said
above. Let users be in control. Both in what they do run, and in what
they do not run.
But I cannot see why you would bring up censorship in relation to this.
As I see it, helping users who would be offended by WebCollage to avoid
unintentionally running it, has as little to do with censorship as
helping them to avoid unintentionally running 'rm -rf /'.
//Rickard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]