On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 07:18:04PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Peter Vandenabeele wrote: > > This needs to be done fast, so that journalists and other interested > > parties that want to follow up on this "news" also get our side > > of the story. Otherwise we leave them with only the ZDnet side of > > the story. > > Where is the problem? We cannot correct everything a random news > media emits about Debian. We haven't done that and we probably > won't do that. > > Why not update the exact source zdnet used for their story? > I.e. send a mail to debian-devel-announce with what you proposed?
Because, as I just mailed to press@, it is important to let *users* know to use the new images, or to correct their installation, even if they've already downloaded the old (after reading the 3.1r0 announcement on debian-announce). I'm more concerned about user confusion than about what ZDnet happens to be saying. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
