> > I guess you just can't see how this is different from the case where > > you have two different kernels for the same cpu, and they already have > > the capability of running many of the same binaries?
On Sun, Nov 21, 1999 at 02:01:46PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote: > They can? I thought iBCS was dead. I wouldn't know and I wasn't refering to iBCS. And from your comments below I think you know that. > > Or did you have a point? > > Why would emulation under a different kernel be any more acceptable > than emulation of a different processor? I know that it's been claimed > that FreeBSD's emulation runs Linux binaries faster than Linux does, > but come on. You say the purpose of this is to allow Debian users > to witness the power of the FreeBSD kernel, and then you want to > cripple it? What problem are you trying to solve? -- Raul
