On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 09:11:34PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > My investigation showed that there are quite some lists that are not > used (anymore), but that have people subscribed. I watched the lists > for about three weeks. There are lists that are of very low traffic > which is intended, so they were ignored.
I think that debian-devel-games was intended as low-traffic. There are enough game-specific issues with debian (sgid dirs and files, common libraries, standards, etc.) that I think the list is fully justified. In fact, I'd like to see it be a recommended list for all maintainers who package games. The list was useful when the FSB made us move /var/lib/games to /var/games (and would have been more useful if more people were subscribed). Chances are it'll be useful the next time something like that arises. Please don't axe debian-devel-games. Aside from that, I have no objections to the proposed list removal. cheers -- Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra- osis is too long [EMAIL PROTECTED] | microscopicsilico- to fit into a single or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | volcaniconi- standalone haiku
