Our position is outlined in our social contract.
Yes, I've read that a few times... :-)
Personally, I don't think we should spread the support of non-free. We abide by our social contract to allow it a place in our archive, and I think that's far enough
My own feelings is that it goes too far, but that topic has been raised before and debated/voted on.
IOW, I think that debianHELP.org announcing non-free software is not a good idea.
Good point. But if we want to compare debianhelp.org "announcing" a non-free package and debian.org "distributing" a non-free package, it doesn't make much sense. To me there's a clear distinction on which one does more potential damage to free software.
-- Regards, | Dear Diary: I recompiled my OS kernel today. . | Randy | Why? Because with GNU/Linux, I can! ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) |
