Duncan Findlay writes ("Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4"):
> Other considerations, many of these are taken from Branden Robinson,
> whose e-mails you don't seem to read anymore:
...
> 2) You need to explain what you mean by the Project Leadership
> explicitly (I suggest you add "(i.e. the DPL or a delegate of the DPL
> with jurisdiction over the issue)", as Branden suggested)I've done this in my working draft. > 3) Please include the situation where people argue over bug > severities, not just re-assigning and closing/re-opening. How about this paragraph * The bug is submitted at one severity, but the maintainer feels that a different severity is appropriate. In the absence of any other guideance from the Project Leadership, the bug should be generally left at the maintainer's preferred severity. ? > Please read my diff. There are other suggestions I have not discussed > here, as they are relatively clear, like sentence clarifications or > improvements. As I said earlier, diffs are far too much hard work - particularly if they're full of stylistic and idiolectical changes which I disagree with. So, I'm not going to read your diff. Can't you suggest changes in prose, instead ? Thanks, Ian.
