* MJ Ray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > The restrictions permitted by a *registered* trademark are oppressive > and Debian should not use them. Furthermore, it should not use > copyright licences to police its logos because it is then promoting > non-free software.
They're not oppressive and Debian certainly *should* use them to avoid
dillution of the Debian mark. Provided trademark law handles all the
situations we need it to, I agree that we shouldn't need to have a
restrictive copyright license.
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
