* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ["Debian Core Consortium" ideas] > > No, actually, it's probably better to make sure those involved > > understand the trademark issues *before* they go off and develop > > advertising based off it, tell reporters about it, and who knows what > > else. The earlier the better since the earlier they're aware of it the > > easier it is for them to change it. > > Somehow I have the impression that Ian Murdock knows a little bit about > Debian - we don't need to explain how it works to him. I think. Maybe.
As long as they understand it. Is SPI aware of it? Has the name been
officially licensed as a submark of Debian? Before babbling to the
press using that name it certainly should be and I havn't seen anything
on any of the lists about that being done (SPI or Debian). I suppose I
don't follow *every* list, and I might have missed it, but it seems kind
of unlikely.
So, sure, Ian may have some idea about Debian, and that *might* imply
some understanding of the trademark issues but it certainly sounds
like they're going about setting up this consortium in the wrong way.
Get your trademarks and whatnot set up *before* talking to the press
about it all.
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
