Benj. Mako Hill wrote: > <quote who="Stephen Frost" date="Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 12:14:45PM -0400"> >>I would encourage SPI to contact their counsel regarding this and that >>anyone involved in the creation of this new entity not be involved in >>any decisions by SPI on if the submark should be granted. > > I forwarded the first message in this thread to the spi-trademark list > and Greg Pomerantz, SPI's General Counsel and long-term attorney for > trademark issues, certainly knows about this. > > It's less than ideal to have this brought up on the list first. Ian, > let's continue this conversation on spi-trademark. I'm sure Greg will > be happy to talk things over personally as well.
Re the organization formerly known as the Debian Core Consortium: No need. We won't use the word Debian in the name--we'll call ourselves the DCC Alliance, where DCC stands for "Debian Common Core". Re Debian having a more restrictive trademark policy than Linux: Let's definitely talk about that. (I'm not on these lists, so please CC me on all correspondence.) -- Ian Murdock 317-578-8882 (office) http://www.progeny.com/ http://ianmurdock.com/ "A nerd is someone who uses a telephone to talk to other people about telephones." --Douglas Adams -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
