On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 08:52:55PM -0400, Bruce Perens wrote: >I am not sure we should tell Ian Murdock how to use his and his wife's >name. Don't send a request until we have consensus on that. If we do >it, it should be VERY polite.
I don't believe that anyone's disputing Ian's use of the Debian mark here, but rather the context in which it was used. As far as I recall, the problem with "Trusted Debian" (now Adamantix) was not the "Debian" part, but the implication that "normal" Debian was *not* trusted/secure. Similarly, the name "Debian Core Consortium" to me suggests that this group has in some way *control* over the Debian core, as opposed to merely *using* the Debian core. Ian has subsequently indicated[0] that the name will now be the "DCC [Debian Common Core] Alliance", which is certainly more palatable. --bod [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2005/07/msg00258.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
