Andrew Suffield writes: > So your claim is that you can never object to people for working > against consensus because doing so would be working against > consensus. Well, that appears to deny you from being allowed to make > that point, so I think your argument is self-defeating.
I have no objection to saying that people are working against consensus -- provided it is done in a way that does not further impair that consensus. Your approach seemed much more likely to annoy and mislead people than to help identify where they agree or disagree. But I give up. I think it will be less hassle to killfile you rather than try to reform you to minimal sociability. Michael Poole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
