On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 12:28:11AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > But beyond that, yes, when there's something to report, I plan on > > making either -private or -project as appropriate aware of what is > > being done, just like any other delegate. > > The concerns here are "acknowledging Debian" and "not being > misleading", and they're shared by everyone involved, no? Is there > some reason either list is inappropriate for working out how to > simultaneously address those concerns?
The lists are appropriate for figuring out which solutions are acceptable to Debian, and indeed, the discussions here continue to be useful to that end. If a decision on my part ends up being actually required, I plan on bringing the alternatives here for discussion before actually making a decision. In either case, some parts of the discussion will remain private if I feel that is the proper method to resolve the situtation as amicably as possible. Don Armstrong -- It was said that life was cheap in Ankh-Morpork. This was, of course, completely wrong. Life was often very expensive; you could get death for free. -- Terry Pratchet _Pyramids_ p25 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
