On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:57:37AM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On 12/15/05, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 01:06:51PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:57:12PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote: > > > > I don't disagree. I would much rather every ubuntu change had a > > > > corresponding patch filed in the BTS, > > > > > > Every "relevant" change put into the BTS would be nice, yes. Filing > > > > Notice that it is official ubuntu directive to *NOT* do that, that is to not > > send patches directly to the BTS, > > Please give a reference to this directive. I am part of the MOTU team, > and have never heared about such a directive.
Personal mail or irc reference from Colin Watson when i complained about him having filled a bug against parted with a link to a patch, and the link then dissapeared. I have had confirmation from this fact by others later on, and even said something about this in the bug report in question or here in the past, and was not chalenged. This was almost a year ago now though, and things may have changed. > > Friendly, > sorry, this is unfriendly distribution of FUD. Well, given my sources, i suppose you would reconsider this classification as FUD :) It may be outdated info, which would be very very welcome indeed, but in no case FUD. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
