* MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:01:18 21:22 +0000]: > Erinn Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Were I a listmaster, that would've > > been one of my considerations, regardless of what he'd done to justify > > the ban. I think it's potentially important that the rest of us know > > some disciplinary action has been taken, but I can't say that it's > > relevant to, say, his future employers. > > Is there anyone who wouldn't hire Andrew because he was > *punished* for a post, rather than because of the post? > The "lesbians" post was public and GPG-signed, after all.
Fair enough, but exacerbating the situation doesn't seem like an improvement. I am, of course, wildly speculating on potential motivations, rather than asserting something should be public. I suspect the listmasters are the only ones who actually know why it was done the way it was. > Religious intolerance reflects more badly on debian than the minority. > Help stop it, please. I'm afraid I haven't got a clue what you're talking about here. > > (M-F-T: set to -project, *please* reply there.) > > (Done manually. M-F-T is a broken non-standard.) Apologies, I was unaware of this until you mentioned it. (Please be more verbose in the future.) -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
