On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 11:33:15PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 11:19:18PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 10:49:51PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > 2) on april 28, a week ago, i made the following proposal to Steve > > > McIntyre, > > > who the DPL delegated to speak with me : > > > > > > If they refrained from bashing on me regularly again, and restored my > > > commit > > > rights, and i would continue my one-post-per-day-per-thread policy, i > > > think > > > this might be an acceptable compromise. > > > > > A compromise is when everyone make some steps forward to agree on > > something. From my point of view, you're asking for others to make these > > steps forward, provided that you don't have to move. That's not a > > compromise. > > A compromise is when both sides give way a bit, so that we reach a point that > everyone can accept. I made a proposal, and there was no reply. There was no > proposal at all from the other side.
Your proposal sounds like they have to take back everything and you... have nothing to do. How can that reach to a compromise ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
