On Mon, 15 May 2006 22:04:01 -0500, Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...] > Stage 1: [...] > 6. can use his gpg key to upload this package [2] > -> no account/@d.o address yet > -> every upload which would go to NEW needs a sponsor [3,4] I think it may be good to allow the sponsor to decide when the DM is allowed to make uploads without a sponsor when he/she is satisfied that the DM knows what he's doing with the package. e.g. simple packages may just need a single upload. More complicated packages (e.g. libraries, if the DM doesn't have previous experience packaging libraries) may need a bit more oversight by the sponsor before he/she is satisfied. [...] > [3] Do we allow existing sources with new binaries to go to new? > (Library renames etc.) > -> has to be discussed We could leave this up to ftp-master. e.g. for a simple SONAME bump, they can accept the package. For more complicated package reorganizations, they can reject with a request for a sponsor. -- Hubert Chan - email & Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.uhoreg.ca/ PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA (Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
