On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 09:23:53AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > How about simplifying the strictures in the constitution to > > something like this: > > That seems a substantial power transfer to the DPL, with the related loss > of scrutiny. It may not cause problems now, but it's quite a bet on > the financial prudence of all future DPLs. Is it possible to simplify > the constitution, while keeping a similar level of public scrutiny as > the current SPI partner approval process? > > Would making the list of approved organisations a foundation document > do that, or make it even stronger?
That would be too cumbersome. While having to vote on allowing changes to the list of approved organizations is a measure that could have some merit (though I'm not convinced it's actually necessary), requiring a supermajority for that is excessive. -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
