On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 12:52:30PM -0500, Ean Schuessler wrote: > If the d-i team takes action that the rest of the project does not agree > with then the project is perfectly capable of deciding that they are no > longer the d-i team.
There is no "rest of the project"! The d-i team is, for all intents and purposes, an _independent_ project whose product _happens_ to be uesd by Debian. Debian actually has no more say in the actions or make-up of the d-i team than they do in the actions or make-up of the kernel devs or X.org. The most that Debian could do is force a fork, and if a fork is all that's desired, Sven can set one up on his own! He doesn't need a GR to force a fork! > I still wonder why his mailing list access wasn't clipped instead of > his CVS account. Because it was the d-i project that decided to take action, not the Debian project. The d-i project controls his SVN access; the Debian project controls the mailing lists. The d-i project cannot "clip" his access to Debian lists, and the Debian project cannot add or remove his d-i commit access. -- Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra- osis is too long [EMAIL PROTECTED] | microscopicsilico- to fit into a single or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | volcaniconi- standalone haiku -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
