Manoj Srivastava writes ("Re: Constitutional Amendment GR: Handling assets for
the project"):
> As individuals, people who make up the board of SPI can
> already put in their input. Officially, the SPI board has no say
> here -- as individuals, they have the same rights as everyone else.
Not all of the current and future SPI board are participating here.
I would suggest that the right approach would be to wait until after
the SPI election, and then send a copy of the proposed amendment to
spi-general, giving a specific timeframe for comments.
> > Of course it is your ammendment, so it is your decision.
>
> Quite right. The DPL can, of course, extend the minimum
> discussion period, under our constitution.
It's the seconders' decision too.
Manoj, would you please commit to not holding a vote on this until
after the SPI election. If you won't make such a promise, I will
withdraw my second until later.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
