On Sat, Jul 29, 2006, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > > So, more a "spec -> validation -> team -> NMUs" workflow than giving > > superpowers to some developers in some areas. > Let's keep the spec thing somewhat low profile. We're not having > exclusively good experiences with that at the moment. The python policy > thing is plainly sad and I'd much rather have someone wildly NMUing > packages and not be able to do dist-upgrades without thinking for a > month than having people like Joe W. give up.
Well, I don't know what went wrong with the Python Policy and Joe W., I simply know that he dropped his Python packages, and that he was a skilled developper. We do have a technical comitted to ultimately decide on the technical quality of proposed changes, no idea if that would have helped for the problem you mention. -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
