Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu 31. August 2006 12:47, you wrote:
> > Without a binary version someone upload (and therefor should
> > have tested), he could always claim his upload would have
> > worked if the buildds would not have mangled it. So there is
> > at least one package everyone can check who is to blame for
> > it.
>
> You are right, I wrote source-only upload, but obviously
> upload-binary-and-remove-it is better policy.
I suggest that the uploaded binary be kept temporarily, for two
purposes:
- Eliminate the wait for the buildd for the first architecture.
- Allow an automated comparison of the two .debs. This would take
some work to set up, but I would hope to detect a binary that
doesn't correspond to the claimed sources. Also incorrect version
of a compiler and different library versions than claimed in the
dependencies.
- Jim Van Zandt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
