On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:37:48AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:11:08 +0100, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > Manoj, your conflict of interest here is too severe, I think. Would > > you please formally delegate the interpretation of the constitution > > with respect to maintenance of policy to someone else ? > > > I don't think you've been grinding your own axe here but, I would > > like to ask you to do us a favour and present the appearance of > > propriety as well as the fact of it. > > Duly noted. But since the secretary's job routinely involves > running votes and DPL elections in which I have strong opinions, and > interpreting the constitution is an integral part of the process, I > would not be secretary if I did not think I could do my job > impartially despite that. > > If it appears to me that my judgement as secretary is being > affected, I shall immediately recuse myself and delegate the power.
I fear that your judgement to notice such conflict of interest is not so good as you think, since this is already the second time in a few weeks you are at the extreme limit of this boundary. Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
