On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 06:15:03PM +1000, Anthony Towns <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 09:11:31AM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: > > Anthony Towns <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Personally, I'd say that now would be the time for any anti-payment > > > people to say "we can do this better, and look, we'll prove it", and make > > > up their own target date for etch, and demonstrate how much energy and > > Now if only you could understand that we don't give a shit about the > > release date, that would be a great step forward. > > Only quality matters. > > Quality is not, and has never been, the question. > > The question is whether we can hit our quality target without forcing our > users to put up with obsolete software -- either the previous release's > because we keep delaying the release date, or the forthcoming release's > because we have an overly extended freeze.
Which is why we release with gnome 2.14. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
