On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 03:33:49PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 02:17:35PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > [...] Personally, I don't consider the experiment over > > > 'til all those loose ends are tied up; and it could easily turn out that > > > the logistical issues alone are enough of a problem to make this sort > > > of endeavour not worth the effort. > > What about the analysis and resulting conclusion, report, whatever of this > > experiment ? > > I wouldn't expect those to be started until the experiment is over.
I would expect that some thought about what is going to happen when the experiment is over be shared before the experiment had begun, as many asked for. I would further expect that you didn't try to pollute the experiment result with stuff like the mail starting this thread. From the tone of that mail, it indicated clearly that for you the experiment was over, and that you called for experiment oponents to be remotivated for that. Sorry, but again, this cannot happen until the final report is there, and your mail was all but a good idea. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
