Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <LI>The Technical Committee and/or its Chairman;</LI> > > + <LI>The Social Committee and/or its Chairman;</LI> [+ many similar additions]
Alternatively, just s/The Technical Committee/A constitution-defined committee/ where applicable. I think adding soc-ctte analogues to most mentions of tech-ctte makes the constitution significantly less readable. [...] > + <li> > + <p>Decide on any matter of social policy.</p> > + > + <p>This includes social norms and customs, non-technical communication > + among developers, and day-to-day organization matters within the Project. > + </p> > + </li> The above power seems daft. soc-ctte deciding that farting loudly in DebConf dinner attendees' faces is a social norm would not make it so. This power needs omitting or rewriting to be much closer to the equivalent tech-ctte one, so it does not permit contradicting reality. [...] > + <li>At least one third of all elected candidates should have been > + members of the project for at least Y/2 years, where Y is the age > + of the Project in years. If fewer than one third of candidates meet > + this requirement, the election process is repeated.</li> Repeated an infinite number of times? Cool DoS. Regards, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
