On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 12:13:55PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:54:54PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > > Anthony Towns <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If they don't do it, and it's important, someone else will. Cf the > > > security team versus testing security support, backports or [...] > > That's fine if "they" don't do it. I think the problem is when > > they're doing it and make a mistake which they won't fix: how can > > anyone else fix it without some pretty ugly forking/competition? > > What's so wrong with forking and competition? Isn't that the whole point > of free software -- that you can do things yourself rather than having > to rely on someone else?
It is an enormous waste of time and manpower that would better be invested in something useful. Forks are usually forced by circumstances because the people behind the "Original" are not willing to cooperate. Debian being forced to fork something as important as ftpmaster[1] would definetely show that Debian is an utter failure, and I am pretty disappointed that you are seriously suggesting a fork of Debian's infrastructure (which would actually be a fork of Debian proper) instead of making Debian work. I mean, if anybody can prevent this from happening, you are. At least in the position you are currently holding. And, I might add, you are doing a pretty good job. Unfortunately, not as a DPL, but as campaign aide for the other candidates. Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
