Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Personally, I think the idea of a DD having to ack his nomination, though > > only > > after being nominated by some (Q?) fellow DDs would be better than a plain > > self-nomination. What do others think? > > Sounds better to me.
I'm not sure. Wouldn't it inevitably lead to campaigning for nominations before the campaigning period? Even so, I reckon at least three candidates campaigned early this year, so maybe it's time to rethink the campaigning period. The more zealous politicians run amok already because it isn't enforced. Is it time to run up the white flag and admit the project has politicking and various popularity contests 24-7-365? Regards, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
