Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I do not have the unlimited time to waste with useless speudo discussions. I am sorry, but this will be the last response to you unless you start to open your mind to the reality.
For the same reason. this reply is shortened. > > - dozens of unfixed bugs in mkisofs. > > > Right. People keep asking you to specify *which* bugs. You provided a > few: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/03/msg02703.html > > Eduard's response: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/03/msg02863.html Are void. > > > > > I would hardly call it misquoting: > > > > > > > > [ missunderstood text removed, see my other mail ] > > > > > > > I see. So the opinions of Sun *and* the FSF on the GPL and CDDL are > > > misunderstood? Who, pray tell, are we supposed to seek for a > > > non-misunderstood opinion? Yourself? > > > > Are you really unable to understand the problem? > > > > It makes no sense to quote text that is not related to what's done inside > > cdrtools. If you like to be taken for serious, you should not quote text > > that > > only applies to non-GPL code that has been derived from GPLd code. > > > Really? I fail to see how it makes any difference if the GPL code > sprang out of nothing or was derived from some other code? That is like > saying that GPL code that is someone's original creation is treated > differently than GPL code which is derived from the Public Domain. How > can that be? The GPL is known to be asymmetric (which is a problem) and even the founder of Debian does not follow your strange ideas on interpreting the GPL..... http://ianmurdock.com/?p=278 (see 3rd paragraph) > > > By the way, did you miss the whole XFree86/X.Org fiasco? If you choose > > > > You again demonstrate that you did missunderstood things. > > Xfree did get into problems because it changed it's license to something > > less > > free and completely unclear. Xorg did come up again because Sun did > > contribute > > more money and human resources to Xorg, starting a few weeks before the > > Xfree > > desaster. > > > I don't buy it. The license change to XFree86 was committed on 13 > February 2004: > > http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/doc/sgml/LICENSE.sgml.diff?r1=1.23&r2=1.24&hideattic=0 > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg03271.html > > The X.Org Foundation was formed on 22 January 2004. The XFree86 > disaster started long before either of those events. You still ignore facts! I was quoting one of the leading X.org members who is obviously better informed than you. Do you really believe that it was posible to obtain a single letter top level domain name in 2004? X.org has been founded around 1987. Too much FUD from you, I need to stop replying here.... Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
