-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Torsten Trautwein wrote:
>> Frankly, I think that both are fairly corny. If we are to change, we >> should >> make a more meaningful change. > > I've got no problems with a more serious naming resource, the Simpsons > were just a pretty obvious (Lenny) suggestion. I reread your message a couple of times, but I fail to see your motivation behind this proposal. Except for your personal preference, what problems do you see with current naming scheme? The current scheme is non-offensive, simple (one word), and somewhat meaningful (for example Sid is the kid that breaks toys). If you do not like the names, you can use Stable, Testing, Unstable, or version numbers. For example "Stable 4.0" == "Etch". -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGWE9lztOe9mov/y4RAtj2AKDHMXKSGvYM3cXiznKClMRv69fSIACfU5Mk F25/5ygsxFtU/Dly5onv008= =DzL+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
