Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > However, while searching the website, I found that there appears to be > no such "documented procedure". Of course it's possible that I missed > something obvious (in which case I'd appreciate for people to point me > to the bits I missed), but if that isn't the case, then I think we > should actually go ahead and create such a "documented procedure". > > Comments?
I don't doubt the Official Use logo shouldn't be used for your slides at present. I think there's some value in having a documented procedure for it to be used, but that should try to protect the project against (for example) a past DPL candidate presenting their platform as The Official Word Of Debian or similar. But I'm not sure whether it's worth the effort: most people recognise the Open Use logo. What I'd really like is for people to do what they said and relicense the Open Use logo under free terms. Regards, -- MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Experienced webmaster-developers for hire http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ Also: statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder, workers co-op. Writing on koha, debian, sat TV, Kewstoke http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
