Hi! * Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070621 09:40]:
> > Actually, it's totally unthinkable that a non-profit organization could do > > this kind of deal, in which Microsoft pays you to perform hara-kiri by > > losing the right to distribute GPLv3 software. This is exactly what a > > positioning statement would reflect: that our community model is > > invulnerable to this kind of threats (and also to going out of bussiness, > > etc). > It would probably not be the worst idea to publish a position statement. I would to see some kind of statement, too. I think we should at least come up with a (general) position statement about patent (including, why we consider our position not a thread for our users). Such a statement wouldn't need to mention MS in any way, if that's wished. Yours sincerely, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
