On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 11:04 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 09:55:57AM +0200, Bart Martens wrote: > > I'm sure that the intentions are good, but Joerg has a point about these > > three DM's. Maybe it is better to replace these three DM registrations > > in the DM keyring by three artificial DM's owned by DD's.
> I don't think having dummy uploads introducing made up names into > Uploaders fields is a great idea, The point is that three real non-DD's got upload rights via the DM keyring without following the rules of the GR. > and limiting testing to DDs means you > don't get reports of things that are obvious to DDs but aren't for people > who've never uploaded before. That might be a disadvantage, but that doesn't change the fact that the point is ... see above. > I don't think any solution short of "revert the GR entirely" would > stop those complaints -- I'm not requesting to "revert the GR entirely". The point is ... see above. > and in turn is why they're correlated with the > original votes. Even if such correlation would exist (*), then still the point is ... see above. (*): I voted "further discussion" at the time, and now that the GR got accepted, I have offered my help to do beta-testing of the DM-infra. I don't see any amusement in reading that I would be one of those who "find fault with this no matter what happens". Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
