Le Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 07:55:02PM -0300, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : > --- pkgs.dbk.orig 2008-08-13 16:44:44.000000000 -0600 > +++ pkgs.dbk 2008-08-13 16:52:12.000000000 -0600 > @@ -1892,6 +1892,14 @@ > might be helpful). > </para> > <para> > +While preparing the patch, you should better be aware of any package-specific > +practices that the maintainer might be using. Taking them into account > reduces > +the burden of getting your changes integrated back in the normal package > +workflow and thus increases the possibilities that that will happen. A good > +place where to look for for possible package-specific practices is > +<ulink > url="&url-debian-policy;ch-source.html#s-readmesource"><literal>debian/README.source</literal></ulink>. > +</para> > +<para> > Unless you have an excellent reason not to do so, you must then give some > time > to the maintainer to react (for example, by uploading to the > <literal>DELAYED</literal> queue). Here are some delays that you could use > as
Hi all, I would prefer a stronger wording, for example: While preparing the patch, pease take them into account the package-specific practices documented by the maintainer in <ulink url="&url-debian-policy;ch-source.html#s-readmesource"><literal>debian/README.source</literal></ulink>. If your NMU is not an urgent matter, it is your responsability to reduce the burden of getting your changes integrated back in the normal package workflow. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
