MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Forwarded From: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] > Your above condition, 2 different DDs, seems really slow to me, if you > want to put a bottom limit, i would maybe chose the quorum of debian > votes or something such meaningful.
Equally, 50 seems far too high to me. I'd be surprised if 50 DDs are active in mediation at one time. > Furthermore, I believe that any person who is actually willing to > participate in a debian-mediation mailing lists, will probably be able > to configure procmail or another filtering software to avoir reading > unwanted posts, or simply ignore them in their mail reader. I think that's unacceptable for three reasons: firstly, it repeats work (all N subscribers updating their filters); secondly, the archives become less useful; thirdly, someone behaving badly enough to get banned from a list of mediators *really* needs to know that. > That said, this brings another proposal. I believe that for the sake of > transparency, we should set up a debian-censorship, [...] Clearly, such a list cannot be hosted by the project, because if messages were appearing, they would not be censored. If such a list is set up somewhere, I'll ask the listmasters to include it in any SMTP error when a message is rejected. I don't think it can necessarily be included in other filters without blowback. Regards, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
