MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It most certainly is not. I can attest to that personally, having been >> involved in and followed multiple FSF projects for many years. It is >> an expectation for all GNU projects. > Expectation and advice, but not a rule and definitely not enforced. I > can attest to that personally for similar reasons. It's treated and prioritized as a bug. As with any persistant bug, I expect it would be cause to replace maintainers if it went unaddressed for too long and caused issues. Certainly a fair bit of pressure is applied to fix it when it comes to the FSF's attention in the cases that I've seen, but I've never seen a GNU software maintainer refuse to fix it, so I don't know what happens if it comes to that. > Sorry, I wasn't suggesting that you were. I meant that I think that > sites like badvista.fsf.org are counter-productive. Oh, okay, I completely misunderstood. Sorry about that. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
