Osamu Aoki <[email protected]> wrote: > I am sick of seeing too many votes/policy-discussion/... to force other > volunteers to obey particular action patters. Basic principle of this > project should be more inclusive one and volunteer one. It should not > be a one of exclusion and enforcement. Volunteer project should be > based on coercion.
I don't think coercion is a good thing and I don't think that to ask other volunteers not to do particular acts is the same as "to force other volunteers to obey". This is what I thought "Nothing in this constitution imposes an obligation on anyone to do work for the Project" meant. So, the rest of the argument falls because of the above mistake in the first step. However, the conclusion:- > Exclusion attitudes will only narrow our user/developer base and > benefits none of us whatever opinion we have. We should thrive to find > common ground. shows that you can state a good conclusion despite a bad step. Maybe that conclusion is a common ground? Best wishes, -- MJ Ray (slef) Webmaster for hire, statistician and online shop builder for a small worker cooperative http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ (Notice http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html) tel:+44-844-4437-237 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
