On Monday 05 January 2009 12:17:42 MJ Ray wrote: --cut-- > There are already crude mechanisms (reply privately, reply publicly, > report abuse and so on) but they are social more than technical.
Agruably, these mechanisms don't reveal the big picture to the society (i.e. what people think about someone's *public* message), thus they would hardly be classified as pretty much social. > While a more technical tool may help, a near-totally technical one > probably can't fix social problems. I don't see how you can consider gathering message voting data and exposing the results to the society as not being social, but near-totally technical one. That just helps sorting out and revealing society own's data and overall position. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
