Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: >> And in the comments on debian-qa, Andreas, you conclude that QA is important >> and it would be good to see a wider base - but the debian-qa list is only a >> very small segment of the overall QA activity in Debian, most of which >> doesn't need centralized coordination... > > At least debian-qa is "maintainer" of an increasing amount of packages > and I always wonder who is a reliable coworker (is available and avtive > over a long time period).
Nobody, of course. If debian-qa is "maintainer", that means that the package is orphaned and doesn't have a maintainer. It's just not buggy or useless enough to delete it from the archive straight away. If you expect someone to care for the package other than fixing RC bugs, I think you're wrong. If someone from the QA team actually offers more care, that's fine. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Debian Developer (TeXLive) VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
