Andreas Tille <[email protected]> writes:
[...] >> Take the dpkg package, it currently has 396 bugs open and 13 marked >> important among them (and 176 normal). We had more than 500 bugs 2 years >> ago and it has been a _lot_ of work to get to this state. >> http://people.debian.org/~glandium/bts/d/dpkg.png > > When issuing the mail which I declared as "raw thought" I was aware that > the rule would not work for dpkg and that's why I added some additional > tules to the scoring system which should have made clear that dpkg does > not fall under this suggestion. > > Furthermore the thread was about first and second class (or however you > might call this) packages and my concern was about finding a way to work > with "potential second class" packages. I was explicitely not talking > about dpkg in this sense - but you are right dpkg definitely needs more > love. There're many bugs that fit in this group. Kernel, Parted, Dpkg, APT and so on. I agree with Raphael, this kind of things just doesn't work. -- O T A V I O S A L V A D O R --------------------------------------------- E-mail: [email protected] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br --------------------------------------------- "Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
