On 2009-05-13, Manoj Srivastava <[email protected]> wrote: > ,---- >| 5. Works that do not meet our free software standards >| >| We acknowledge that some of our users require the use of works >| that do not conform to the Debian Free Software Guidelines. We >| have created "contrib" and "non-free" areas in our archive for >| these works. > `---- > As I understand it, we, as a project, have acceoted that there > is tension between the needs of our users, and the dictates of free > software; and the solution we have come up with is called "contrib" and > "non-free" areas in our archive. > Isn't that perfectly clear?
Sure, but why the heck was the discussion if we should delay the release instead of moving the kernel to non-free because it's tainted with few binary blobs? Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
