On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 02:04:34AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> > Something is definitely wrong here, IMHO. > Maybe it's your assumption or assertion that the only point of NEW is > checking the copyright file. He's right that binary NEW is not the right time to be applying unrelated sourceful checks to packages. If ftpmaster feels the need to spot-check packages, that's fine, but that shouldn't be coupled to package renames where the purpose of NEW is to keep control of the package namespace and set the archive overrides. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
