On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 02:19:38AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 23/07/09 at 01:10 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:57:07AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>>> Inactive maintainers do not make harm by definition. >> The two are completely orthogonal. Also, I disagree that inactive >> maintainer do no harm; they do harm if you think they are still >> feeling responsible for a package while they are not. > Sure, I meant that they do not harm the archive since they do not > upload packages. Large numbers of them *do* harm the project since they raise the constitution's Q/K, but don't vote / second proposals / ... I don't think we are at the level where this is an actual problem, but it is theoretically possible. -- Lionel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
