On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 06:40:41AM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote: > On 30-07-2009 07:52, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 09:19:51AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> The new simplified swirl looks cleaner, and it would be nice to move > >> to a free-er font. The example changes to the website made it look > > Might it be worth considering using the new font & so on even if we end > > up keeping the current swirl? > The proposal during DebConf used a non-free font with a free > alternative and some people raised the idea of "creating" a > new one, well, the same idea applies to our current logo's > font, it's just a matter of implement it (and yes, Font > Copyright is different from Software/Trademark). Oh, right. From what Steve said I'd understood that the font in the new logo was already freer than the existing one. > There is no basis to say that the logo/font change would have > a positive impact in our "brand". I broadly agree, though for the font having a free font would be a win anyway. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
