Julien BLACHE <[email protected]> writes: > Indeed. And I truly don't see how being tied to and restricted by > other projects with differing interests can help us there. Quite to > the contrary.
I take it then that another part of Mark's message you discarded was the part where he explained the goal is to discover and better advertise existing opportunities to collaborate, and *not* to have one project “restricted” by another. > > Well, we believe differently, and that's OK. I think it's easy > > enough to go and speak to a few upstreams, and ask them this: "what > > would you do differently if you knew that multiple distributions > > would all sit down and think about which version of your code to > > ship with their big 2010 release?" I think you'd find most of them > > say "that would be amazing". > > I don't really care about what they say, I care about how they act > upon it afterwards. Right. If they gave that answer, I'd be responding “you didn't answer the question: what would you do differently?”. -- \ “For of those to whom much is given, much is required.” —John | `\ F. Kennedy | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
