Raphael Hertzog schrieb am Monday, den 24. August 2009: *snip*
> So please point us to bugs related to breakages on upgrades (there have > been some I know, but I think Petter dealt with them correctly) if you > want to use that argument to not switch to insserv by default. The > current bugs that you pointed out only have to do with file-rc > users that are not happy. > > I would like to mention the fact that the new file-rc maintainer is not > really cooperative either (thus not improving the situation for its > users). It would be nice if Alexander pointed out why he doesn't want to > fix 539609, his angry reply in > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=539591#15 doesn't bring > the discussion forward while Petter tried to lay the path to allow file-rc > to be a working alternative again. I don't see any point on supporting insserv within file-rc. I use file-rc to have an alternative to such a system. File-rc is different and will not work properly with dependency based booting. I think resorting the configuration file (hint, its a user file) is not a solution - so how should I implement it in file-rc?. Its all about choice and also I don't like if another maintainer which is not able to see its own bugs like to force me on its - in my eyes - broken solution. All I want to have is that sysv-rc is working properly, its usage of update-rc.d together with the debconf switch is just broken and a bug and reacting on this bug with filling a bug against file-rc that it should insserv in the future is not ok. Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
