Christoph Berg <[email protected]> writes: > Re: Steve Langasek 2010-07-05 <[email protected]>
>> I haven't seen anyone propose a good name that it can be changed *to*. >> Shouldn't that be the first step? > It would probably be "New Developer". But before everyone rushes to > update lots of documents, let's try to implement some of the changes > to membership like "Debian Contributor". I'm sure along that route lie > more naming updates that would make work done now redundant. And in the process, PLEASE rename Debian Maintainer to something that isn't completely confusing given the existence of a Maintainer field in all of our packages and all the other uses of "maintainer" in Debian that pre-existed the Debian Maintainer system and mean something else entirely. I'm happy to propose a GR to do that (and also make it clear that such details can be changed going forward without a GR) if that will help. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
